Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com> wrote:

So, is there anyone who is _not_ a sponsored developer opposing to kill the mail
spammage? If so:

- could this be mitigated by a separate gerrit-patches mailing list?
- could this be mitigated by a daily digest of "gerrit news"?
- could this be mitigated by other means?

I vote to have a daily digest with just the newly subbmitted patches.
I think it is important with some sort of visibility of the patch flow
on the dev-list, for general heads-up on what is going on, and more
importantly as an instrument to reduce risk of duplication of work.

I'm against having a separate mailinglist for this.i wouldn't
subscribe to this list, and I guess newcomers will simply miss out on
this. In this case pointing to those summaries ought to be enough
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/q/status:open,n,z
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/q/status:merged,n,z
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/q/status:abandoned,n,z

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log

Maybe these links could be inluded into the daily digest as part of
some standard introduction.

/Albert

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.