Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


The dev-ML is to discuss code.
code come as patch, and preferably as gerrit patch... so seing the
patch that are proposed via gerrit is the core function of the ML,
just like before gerrit they where posted to the ML .

and yes I agree with Bjoern that the 'pos-facto' email are the less
interesting part...
but the 'heads-up' part _is_ the interesting part for the dev-ML...

If we remove all the [PATCH] from the ML, what is left ? a dev-discuss list ?

Norbert

PS: if you really do not care about [PATCH] it is really not that hard
to set-up filter on your client side....

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.