Re: Killing the gerrit to dev-list spam ...

Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> The dev-ML is to discuss code.
> code come as patch, and preferably as gerrit patch... so seing the
> patch that are proposed via gerrit is the core function of the ML,
> just like before gerrit they where posted to the ML .
Yup.

> If we remove all the [PATCH] from the ML, what is left ? a
> dev-discuss list ?
It is already now the case that there is a disconnect between
discussing code, or a concrete problem, and the subsequent gerrit
patch submission (case in point: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3699,
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3698 and Noel Grandin's conversion
operators for UNO thread), I'm very hesitant to widen that gap.

Devil's advocate question: with that two-list proposal, where to
discuss a given patch? ;)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature