Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks

On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 21:18 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz> wrote:
> >  I'd like to propose that we convert our
> >
> > #ifdef HAVE_FOO
> > to
> > #if HAVE_FOO
>
>  +1

        Sounds great to me too; though of course I'd prefer to keep the diff
smaller and not replace all the header guards:

#ifndef INCLUDED_OOXML_FAST_CONTEXT_HANDLER_HXX
#define INCLUDED_OOXML_FAST_CONTEXT_HANDLER_HXX

        Which I suspect don't suffer this problem so badly. Given the
reasonably small number of #ifdef conditionals, I guess it'd be fine to
replace them before we've got 4.0.2 out in the wild too :-)

        Thanks !

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot