Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last

2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks

Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud -AT- gmail.com>
Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:18:37 -0500

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz> wrote:


 Hello,

 I'd like to propose that we convert our

#ifdef HAVE_FOO

to

#if HAVE_FOO


 +1

Norbert

Context

#ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Lubos Lunak
- Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Noel Grandin
- Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Norbert Thiebaud
  - Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Michael Meeks
    - Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Tor Lillqvist
      - Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Lubos Lunak
        
        Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Norbert Thiebaud
        
        Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Thomas Arnhold
        
        Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Jan Holesovsky
        Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Norbert Thiebaud
        
        Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks [proof of concept] · Thomas Arnhold
        
        Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Lubos Lunak
        
        Re: #ifdef vs #if for feature checks · Tor Lillqvist

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.