Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I find it peculiar that in the discussion here people keep talking
about patches, as if gerrit was only a "patch" review tool. At least I
understand "patch" to mean a relatively local change to the code in
order to fix some specific bug. But if the intent is that *all*
changes are to go through gerrit, surely the majority of changes
(number-of-lines-wise, not number-wise) going through it will be
feature work and cleanups, not patches?

Will this mean people will start doing less refactoring cleanups, for
instance, in order to make their change sets smaller, to increase the
possibility of somebody reviewing the, eh, "patch"?

--tml

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.