On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:06:28AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:53:42AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
As I review very few patches, keeping me happy in this respect is
probably not high priority, except maybe as a long tail argument (if
we have 100 committers reviewing one patch per two months, that's
still 600 reviews per year... Worth having for the project).
For 6 changes per year, wouldnt you already be well served with the
"watched projects"?
No. When I have some free / floating time, I hunt for low-hanging
fruit in the review queue (patches I can review without understanding
the area), so that the "big" reviewers can focus on the more
complicated reviews. So restricting to a subarea is not helpful.
(But again, if it is low-hanging fruit, it won't take the big
reviewers much time anyway :) )
--
Lionel
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.