Hi Kendy,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:25:18AM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
I believe this way we might keep both camps ("everything into ML" like
me, and "only discussions on the ML" like Bjoern) happy - because the
people who want to have only discussions on the ML would be able to
filter out messages based on the X-gerrit-review: header easily.
Not really, as I am not concern for myself here (or anyone a bit more involved
in the project, who thus has some kind of fancy filtering setup), but people
who are newcomer/volunteers and are invested in the project vacational.
Tuning the defaults of the notifications on the mailing list to those who are
heavily involved (and have custom tooling, filtering etc. in place) would be
wrong. These guys will always be able to opt-in or -out of any information
relevant to them anyway . So the list should give a good place for vocational
contributors by default and then be tweakable (by opt-in) to be the
truckload-of-traffic-because-I-know-my-filters-monster only second.
Best,
Bjoern
Context
[ANN] Please -play-with- Gerrit from now on for Patch Review ... · Michael Meeks
Re: [ANN] Please use Gerrit from now on for Patch Review · Lionel Elie Mamane
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.