On 12/5/11 2:36 PM, Petr Mladek wrote:
I would prefer to keep it as is. In each case, I do not feel like
deciding about this myself.
I think that we can stick to Beta 1, although I feel that there would be
less misunderstandings by using Alpha (for instance, FileHippo has
distributed Beta 0 dropping the 0, and people have started exchanging
the link on user groups, so I had to clarify - on the Italian news group
- that this is not for the general user).
If we stick to Beta 1, though, we should make it VERY clear on the
accompanying message that this is a Beta intended to help developers,
because advanced users can install it to test features and discover
bugs. Otherwise, people - enemies - would start shouting loud that the
quality is bad and LO is unusable (although there will always be these
idiots, and their existence is a demonstration of the quality of the
software, as they shout loud because they are impressed).
--
Italo Vignoli - italo.vignoli@gmail.com
mob +39.348.5653829 - VoIP 5316436@messagenet.it
skype italovignoli - gtalk italo.vignoli@gmail.com
Context
Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] LibO 3.5.0 Beta 0 First assessment · Michael Meeks
Re: [Libreoffice] LibO 3.5.0 Beta 0 First assessment · Petr Mladek
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.