Hi Rainer,
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 08:42 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
it's a disaster, completely unusable ! Quality of Beta0 is far behind
quality of Master during the last weeks, it seems that we were not lucky
with the time where the tag has been created
Quite quite :-) so Beta1 will be much better. And given the state of
Beta 0 - treating it as the quiet practise run it is (rather than
announcing it widely) seems to be the best policy ...
Shit happens, now the question is how we will go on. I am afraid we have
to go the hare way and to find and fix all bugs, or is there any other
possibility to try a new chance?
Well - we've fixed a number of the most obvious packaging bugs,
parallel installability etc. etc. in master - so (without further new
problems - of which we expect some up to the freeze) Beta1 will be
rather better.
Of course it is still -very- early in the schedule:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/3.5
We still have 6 releases over two months in order to fix up the misc.
quality issues to get this right enough for a good point-zero
release :-)
So - beta 1 is due next week; until then perhaps using the master
builds is a good plan (if they're better - they will turn into Beta1
anyway).
Thanks for testing ! and sorry if it caused some grief.
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] LibO 3.5.0 Beta 0 First assessment (continued)
Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] LibO 3.5.0 Beta 0 First assessment · Michael Meeks
Re: [Libreoffice] LibO 3.5.0 Beta 0 First assessment · Petr Mladek
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.