Italo Vignoli wrote (06-12-11 01:44)
If we stick to Beta 1, though, we should make it VERY clear on the
accompanying message that this is a Beta intended to help developers,
because advanced users can install it to test features and discover
bugs.
[...]
Yes, the communication has to be clear about this.
On the other hand, as written before, of course the beta1 might be good
enough for wider testing.
Therefore the bug-hunting session initially thought for the Dec. 9/10,
will be prepared to be held possibly the week later. If it shows that
the beta1 is better for smaller group testing, we will not announce it
and push it to a later date.
More preparations from me probably today, but more likely tomorrow.
I will closely communicate with you Italo, in order to bring the message
across clearly.
Cheers
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] LibO 3.5.0 Beta 0 First assessment (continued)
Re: [Libreoffice] [Libreoffice-qa] LibO 3.5.0 Beta 0 First assessment · Michael Meeks
Re: [Libreoffice] LibO 3.5.0 Beta 0 First assessment · Petr Mladek
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.