Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


IMHO, there's no reason to include old versions of third-party packages in
LibreOffice proper.

Please, are you talking about third-party source code included in the LibreOffice source code (git 
repositories), source code downloaded as part of the build process (unless one tells it to use a 
"system" library), or binaries from either of those included in a binary package? Or all of these?

Up-to-date software can also be used on old Unixes / Linux systems without too
much pain.

Sure, as long as you know what you are doing and packages from various 3rd-party repositories (or 
self-built) are in sync with what LibreOffice expects. But I do think that somebody running some 
random old Unix box would prefer to get an all-inclusing LibreOffice package. Instead of complex 
advice like "additionally you should install foolib from this site, but be careful not to let it 
overwrite the binary incompatible build of foolib from this other site that you might have already"

--tml



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.