IMHO, there's no reason to include old versions of third-party packages in
LibreOffice proper.
Please, are you talking about third-party source code included in the LibreOffice source code (git
repositories), source code downloaded as part of the build process (unless one tells it to use a
"system" library), or binaries from either of those included in a binary package? Or all of these?
Up-to-date software can also be used on old Unixes / Linux systems without too
much pain.
Sure, as long as you know what you are doing and packages from various 3rd-party repositories (or
self-built) are in sync with what LibreOffice expects. But I do think that somebody running some
random old Unix box would prefer to get an all-inclusing LibreOffice package. Instead of complex
advice like "additionally you should install foolib from this site, but be careful not to let it
overwrite the binary incompatible build of foolib from this other site that you might have already"
--tml
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] Kicking off 3rdparty packages (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.