Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:11 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
No, simply state the depencies and let the distros handle the rest.
For old legacy systems, simply create an own micro-distro.

        Luckily we have a micro-distro now; complete with our own build system,
and method of packaging; it is called the "onebigblob" microdistro - and
it works as badly as can be expected when trying to target all distros.

        So - I appreicate the desire to rip stuff out of LibreOffice - but we
should focus on the low hanging fruit that Caolan identified first.
Francois: I expect you to google Tor Lillqvist, and think a bit more
before typing.

        I fully anticipate that the vast majority of users on Linux will get
their LibreOffice from their distribution with system libraries used
everywhere: which produces a better product; -however- this does not
mean it is worthless having generic builds - particularly since we have
a QA team that is dispersed across many Linux's.

        ATB,

                Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.