Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable?

Caolán McNamara <caolanm -AT- redhat.com>
Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:22:18 +0000

On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:05 +0100, David Tardon wrote:

So either we throw out (or rewrite to XSLT 1.0) all XSLT 2.0 filters
and declare that we only support XSLT 1.0 or we're stuck with saxon
(and java).


IIRC we also use a particular extension in saxon which only exists in
some versions of saxon. See the complex foo in configure.in that tries
to detect if the extension is available in the --with-system-saxon case.
That's something else that bothers me greatly. I dislike having to haul
that specific version of saxon around in the distro-case.

C.

Context

Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable? (continued)
- Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable? · Michael Meeks
  - Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable? · Jonathan Aquilina
  - Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable? · David Tardon
    - Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable? · Caolán McNamara
    - [Libreoffice] XSLT for flat XML ? · Michael Meeks
    - Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable? · Wols Lists
      - Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable? · David Tardon

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.