On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:05 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
It would be simply wonderful to re-use the libxslt code (that we
already ship) for the XSLT filter. I wonder if you might be interested
..
I think that's not possible, because some of the filters (like
WordprocessorML) use XSLT 2.0, which is not supported by libxslt (wasn't
supported the last time I looked, at least).
Grief; XSLT is such a disaster area (and google trending below
COBOL) ;-)
So either we throw out (or rewrite to XSLT 1.0) all XSLT 2.0
filters and declare that we only support XSLT 1.0 or we're stuck
with saxon (and java).
Sigh; perhaps what we really want is to write the flat-XML stuff in
native C++ - surely it can't be -that- difficult ? /me knows nothing of
the code flow, but the existing XSLT there seems ~trivial.
Fridrich ? can we turn that into some easy hack ?
Hmm,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable? (continued)
Re: [Libreoffice] Are ISC/BSD-licensed contributions acceptable? · Michael Meeks
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.