I would go with the tabbed bar.
* It is somewhat scalable (e.g. for potential addons ) by adding tabs if
really needed.
* It is similar to the MS office style
** It makes it easier for people who want to switch from MSO
** It can be a good argument for decision makers that it is like
applications people know.
** I assume MS made quite some effort to get the ribbon concept right so
doing something similar is likely to be a good idea.
All this might be better estimated with a usability test comparing the
alternatives in depth, but as long as we did not do this, I would
suggest above reasoning.
Jan
Am 29.03.2018 um 18:23 schrieb Heiko Tietze:
On 29.03.2018 18:02, Pedro Rosmaninho wrote:
IMO, the Groupedbar should be the chosen one.
Here are the reasons why I think it is the most suited one:
1 - *It has a unique look among Office suites
2 - It's distinctive from the Ribbon UI
That was my question. Personally I wouldn't go with the Groupedbar
because it has no advantage over classic toolbars, there is a lot of
unclear movement, and I doubt that Benjamin find his way easily through the
options. Not saying it's bad design.
And your reasons are different from the originally discussed idea to
make it easy to switch from other programs: "It's encouraged to have
Notebookbars that simulate alternative programs but "crazy" ideas with
completely new UI approaches are also welcome."
But it's up to the community, which is first the design team. So more
opinions please.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.