Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: 'adopt-o-meter' for the download page

Hi all,

This is my first email after subscribing to this list only a few days ago
but I've got to put out a big +1 to the proposal put forward in the previous
email.

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:PROP_DownloadsPage_110606NS.jpg

<http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:PROP_DownloadsPage_110606NS.jpg>The
proposed download page looks extremely clean and with some tweaks such as
adding links to the license and sourcecode would be a marked improvement
over the very text heavy current implementation

http://www.libreoffice.org/download/

<http://www.libreoffice.org/download/>Thanks,
Patrick

On 6 June 2011 17:37, Nik <nik@tdf.nikashsingh.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is probably not going to go down well with those who have submitted
> proposals for this task already, but I think we should re-evaluate whether
> some sort of adopt-o-meter will actually /clarify/ things for users. While
> the proposals so far were good, I think I understood them only because I
> knew of the request for them to be made. As a /user/, these visual elements
> are actually quite confusing;
>
> If you put a scale in, does that mean I can either have Stability or
> Features but not both? How am I going to decide what that even means for me
> if I haven't used the software yet?
> Why is 3.3.2 mentioned twice on some scales, does that make it superior to
> 3.4.0?
> What IS an early adopter? is it someone who downloads in the next few
> months? is this a new office suite?
> Does red/orange suggest that this isn't safe software? Does it indicate
> higher processing/resource demands?
>
> I haven't been to the downloads page for a while, after heading there I
> realised most of the problem was the way it is presented.
> it is *VERY* user-*un*friendly;
>
> - How are beginner-users supposed to know what "x86" means?
> - Why is there no emphasis on the actual software download link as opposed
> to the language/help packs?
> - What is with the COMPLETE AND UTTER LACK OF A *DOWNLOAD BUTTON* on this
> "downloads" page?
>
> By comparison, there is no confusion about what to press when you head to
> Mozilla[1], Ubuntu[2], Google[3] or even Microsoft's[4] sites;
> [1] http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/fx/
> [2] http://www.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu/download
> [3] http://sketchup.google.com/intl/en/download/index.html
> [4]
> http://www7.buyoffice.microsoft.com/asia/product.aspx?sku=10234643&cache=793687343&culture=en-AU
>
> I think the cryptic filename-links need to go and the page just needs
> emphasis placed on the right details.
> It's useless to just say this, so I've made a mock-up of a preferable state
> for the downloads page;
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:PROP_DownloadsPage_110606NS.jpg
> I don't know how possible that is to implement, but I'm happy to cough up
> the images of someone is willing.
>
> But essentially, I honestly don't think the Adopt-o-meter graphics are
> helping things right now.
> I think users just need to see a big fat friendly green download button
> with all the affordances they've come to expect.
> I think the adopt-a-meter is essentially marketing-jazz on what is
> essentially Usability-turf. Just my opinion though.
>
> -Nik
>
> PS. I realised my mock-up doesn't have download-size listed anywhere, my
> bad.
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> deleted

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted