Hi,
please allow me to quickly add my thoughts ...
Am Montag, den 25.04.2011, 13:18 +0200 schrieb RGB ES:
2011/4/25 Michel RENON <michel.renon@free.fr>:
Hi,
Few days ago, there was a discussion about the "style" name :
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/msg01436.html
As I've been teaching the basic of OpenOffice 2 or 3 years ago, I can
confirm that the idea of "style sheet" is not obvious. But it seems to me
that the name "style sheet" doesn't help...
I have a suggestion :
what if we completely replace the name "style" (used for style sheet) with
"template" ?
[...]
What do you think ?
Might it help some users ?
[...]
I'm not so sure... I agree that the concept is not simple (I also have
experience teaching the use of Writer), but I don't think that a new
wording could make things easier.
I second this thought ... the name itself is less an issue. The concept
of styles is an issue in several languages (and those guys usually tweak
the naming), therefore renaming in English might have limited effect
only. It might also lead to the contrary - since many Microsoft Office
users are aware of the term "Style".
In my point-of-view, it is an issue that people can hardly experience
the functionality - even by trial and error. And since its hard to use,
we even hide the Stylist per default ... so even less people stumble
over the fact that the Stylist is a powerful tool.
<fun>By the way, will we rename the Stylist to Templatist?</fun>
We discussed this issue many times at OOo, and I came to the following
(personal) conclusion; we need ...
* a more sensible selection of styles (e.g. attach the list styles
to the paragraph styles intended for list use)
* an improved Stylist that makes less use of double-clicks and and
context menus (a bit different to what Rafael proposed) -->
single click confirmation
* a real preview of each Style in the Stylist
* a real preview for the Styles drop-down in the toolbar
* a better connection between the Style drop-down, the Stylist
on/off icon to make the idea of styles more clear
* a more intelligent ordering of styles (not too smart, but smart
enough to present the styles used in the document along with not
used ones)
Of course, there are other ways of improving the use of Styles ... but
this needs a whiteboard :-)
Ricardo, Michel, all - what do you think? Something we might work out
for EasyHacks?
IMO, the chain Format → Style → Template is perfectly valid and do not
need to be changed.
By the way, Word 2007ff: Format → Style → Design → Template
Cheers,
Christoph
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.