Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last

On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 08:56 -0400, webmaster for Kracked Press
Productions wrote: 

On 04/16/2011 10:17 AM, drew wrote:
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 10:02 -0400, drew wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 12:27 -0400, webmaster for Kracked Press
Productions wrote:
Do you know any figures on how many people now use LibreOffice?

OOo use to keep track of this based on the number of downloads from
their site, and the same for Mozilla's browser.  It would be nice to
able to state that 100 thousand, or 1 million, etc., people are now
using LibreOffice.
Hi Tim,

The stats exist, as far as I know. I asked about this, a month ago, and
was told that at this time they will not be released.

Sorry double post - but if I'm not mistaken there where some stats
released recently - I think it was 1.5 million total downloads, I'd
forgotten about that in the last email.

If we could state that Since January 2011, there has been 1 million 
downloads from the LibreOffice web site, and many more are downloading 
it from the Linux Repositories, then we have a good start with telling 
people how "popular" it is becoming.  The fact that most Linux distros 
have dumped Oracle's version in favor of LibreOffice as the their 
default office suite package, is a good thing for "us".  The fact that 
more and more businesses, governments [local, regional, national] have 
dumped MSO in favor of open-source office suites [no mention of OOo] 
will work fine as well for marketing LibreOffice.  The USA Federal 
government is pushing open-source solutions is a big thing for "us".  We 
can say that since our government is pushing for open-source software to 
be used, "why not try it for yourself?.  If there was some list made [I 
asked about this a few years back] made up of all the big businesses, 
governments, schools/colleges, and any other large organization, who 
have switch from MSO to OOo over the years, we could us those "names" 
for reasons for switching to open-source office suite[s].  Since we came 
from OOo, we could still use those facts for promoting switching to 
LibreOffice [open-source] from MSO [not open-source].

Businesses love stats and knowing such-and-such big business decided to 
switch, so if those companies switched to open-source, then maybe this 
is something that their business should look into.  It does not matter 
if they switched to OOo, since that was before Oracle's "mess" and 
LibreOffice being "born" out of that mess.  We can add that LibreOffice 
has been "proclaimed" by the press that it is a better product that OOo, 
so why not try LibreOffice instead of OOo, since it is the better free 
and open-source office suite package on the market today.

I agree showing who has adopted our parent helps us. If they adopted OOo
before we had a release I think that is fair to use.
Jay Lozier

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.