W dniu 06.09.2021 o 21:57, Ilmari Lauhakangas pisze:
On 6.9.2021 19.52, Brett Cornwall wrote:
On 2021-09-06 15:18, Rhoslyn Prys wrote:
Hmmm, that looks pretty technical to me...
Any chance of doing something nice and easy in WordPress or similar?
Just asking :-)
I cannot speak for those owning this project.
Hugo is most certainly a much simpler solution from a maintenance
perspective. Wordpress (and similar CMSes) is a nightmare to maintain
and always devolves into a mess of plugins (that everyone is too
afraid to change/deactivate for fear of breaking the site), custom
PHP snippets galore, horrible WYSIWYG battles, and a general feeling
of dread for ever updating/changing Wordpress. So long as reliance on
JavaScript is kept to a minimum, this will be a win for
libreoffice.org's maintainability and performance (and likely SEO).
As for Git, this technical barrier is a downside for those
unfamiliar: Those in charge of content may very well not be
comfortable with Git. I should hope that the owners of this project
solicited feedback from those in charge of the site content. It's
important that they are comfortable with such a workflow.
If it weren't for merge conflicts and other VCS-isms I would argue
that learning simple markdown files + a Git GUI would be miles
simpler that learning how to use Wordpress... :)
Yep, Brett gets where the idea to try a static site generator came from.
The editors for the English language site have been mostly TDF
marketing staff.
After looking into Hugo, I learned that a lot of our friends are
already using it:
- KDE websites
- FOSDEM 2021 virtual booth system
- Indonesian LibreOffice sites https://github.com/libreofficeid
So we see that one local LibreOffice community already preferred a
static site generator.
As I mentioned in an earlier message, there are many opportunities to
improve the online Gerrit editor from the perspective of web content
editing and the improvements would benefit LibreOffice developers as
well.
Ilmari
A quick thought that I just had concerns the redirections. When
switching from the previous CMS to a new one I actually hooked the
popular old URLs into the new site structure so the thousands existing
links on the websites that we don't have control over would not point to
a non-existing content. Would that be possible after the upcoming change?
Regards
Dominik Danelski
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.