Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Le 2012-09-13 18:19, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
Hi,

Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2012-09-13 23:31:
What I advise against though is keeping both a forum as well as a
mailinglist for the very same scope. This will just fragment the
userbase/people that could provide answers. And of course it will be
much harder to track what happens. If you need to be subscribed to the
mailinglist as well as to visit the forum to keep up-to-date on a
specific topic, then something went wrong.
Waching mailinglist for X, and the forum for Y is fine.

a big +1 to that!

Florian


+1 as well.

We should establish a time-frame where we will have both exist, it should not be so long as to fragment too much of the information. But we should expect a little fragmentation as we set up the forums. I would suggest 9 months to 1 year would be long enough to have a good solid idea of the usage, and the leading members in the lists should try to keep an open mind about this, and, also try to participate on both systems.

BTW ... I agree wholly with Bjoern's suggestion that the forums would be a great place to help our "power" and "motivated" users to migrate from "user" to "contributor". We not only need devs but we are in severe shortage of QA helpers, marketing, design, wiki maintainers, website maintainers (those who help with page write-up and bug fixing), historical documentors, etc. -- essentially those who make up the "other" side of LibreOffice, the public view.

The only problem I can see is with the "users" list where talk of all aspects of LibreOffice is taken up. The forums will have essentially a "users" section most likely in the form of a divided up Modules section and perhaps a General section etc. So, in this case, I could see the users list having to live a little longer until we can gauge whether to close it down or keep it. IMO, forum are generally more "user friendly" to use for help -- users need a quick answer to a particular problem with the suite and only that -- signing onto a mailing list is normally not what they want. As far as losing the helpful information on the users list, the co-coordinator team can make it part of their "projects" to re-mine the information and re-post on the forums in the right location.

For contributor lists (the rest of all other TDF/LibreOffice mailing lists), we could gauge as to whether these would be best closed or left open or vice versa. This project has a long history of contributor-mailing-lists use, not so for user use where the OOo forums have been used mostly for user help. As far as losing the helpful information on the OOo forums, the co-coordinator team can make it part of their "projects" to re-mine the information and re-post on the forums in the right location if this proves to be necessary or link to the appropriate information on the AOO forums.

Cheers,

Marc


--
Marc Paré
Marc@MarcPare.com
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.