Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Narayan Aras wrote (19-01-11 10:50)

And you, don't play the "clueless leader".

Thanks  :-D

See this mail first:
I specifically asked whether Drupal was official. Why did it go on for ages without a clear "yes" or 
"no" answer.

I have specifically remarked that the SC decision is ambivalent; and that we should not be made to 
second-guess SC's decisions.

Later the thread settled and then I started work. Not before.

I thought I had read apologies from Charles on the list. So was a bit surprised by the (as far as I read...) continued discussion. Sorry if my post was too much showing my irritation, that even might have been misplaced.


Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:27:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-website] [Drupal] The road ahead and  missed  opportunities

Hi gang,

Narayan Aras wrote (19-01-11 10:22)

The whole work was in accordance with SC's decision.

Pls don't play the killed innocence here.
There were enough mails that should have make you think.


 - giving its foundation :: The Document Foundation -

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.