Re: [libreoffice-website] ConfCall wiki page broken?

Le 2010-11-05 14:59, Nino Novak a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 05 November 2010 17:05, Florian Effenberger wrote:
>
> > I'm happy to hear other opinions, but IMHO we *NEED* a WYSIWYG
> > editor. Many users will be very uncomfortable otherwise, so I'd even
> > take the risk of slightly defective pages in favor of WYSIWYG.
>
> I'd like to argue with Manuel against a broken editor as it generates
> additional work. Without permanent watching and fixing, even content
> can be lost.
>
> If we go for pure Wiki-markup, what do we lose?
>
> Some pages might not look as nice as they would but nothing would be
> broken/lost. My personal opinion is clearly, better some correct but
> ugly pages than nice but broken.
>
> If really necessary, I'd even volunteer to help beginners tidying up
> markup ;-)
>
> But I'd not volunteer doing absloutely stupid work of fixing pages
> people have destroyed without noticing. You'll have to review any
> single edit then! A nightmare.
>
>
> > > * I don't see a big need for a real WYSIWYG editor. Wikimedia has
> > > found the biggest online community in the world, not even having
> > > the UsabilityInitiative improvements available for many years.
> >
> > I know my users. ;)
>
> Trust poeple! They might exceed your expectations :-)
>
> Nino

I would not go to Wiki-markup. New users will look at the page, have no 
idea there is help and not contribute. We should offer a WYSIWYG editor 
of any kind that works as 100% of the membership can use it. Why would 
we reduce the contribution rate if we can find a fix?

I would vote to find a working WYSIWYG editor.

Marc


--
E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted