Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Le 2010-10-20 11:00, Benjamin Horst a écrit :
Marc,

Thanks for stepping in here and helping us organize this last bit of work. Your taking on the role 
of an impartial organizer is vital.


Thanks, no problem, I just happen to have the time to work on this. I am just recovering from 2 spinal surgeries and having to re-learn walking and other things ... nasty stuff spinal injuries. Also, the only comfortable position for me right now is one particular chair in my house and no other. Lying on my back is actually quite painful.

On Oct 20, 2010, at 4:10 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Does anyone else have any specs to add to the list. Today (Wednesday) is most likely the last day 
that specs should be added and it will leave us presumably two more days (Wednesday, Thursday) for 
debate, testing and viewing of results of changes on the demo sites.

I am not sure, but do we also have to have a hands up of people who are willing to contribute their 
time to help administer the site regardless of the choice of CMS? IMHO think that this kind of 
commit would be nice to submit to the SC.

I will help in either case. (Though I'll be more effective with Drupal since I already know the 
system.)

Remember André's original post that the SC discussed the choice of CMS at their last meeting and 
the SC now wants to hear a proposal by the end of the week as to which CMS the team recommends. So, 
our recommendation will go to the SC as a proposal which they will consider.

I would then suggest that our proposal should then account for the following:

* CMS proposed by the team:
* Virtues of the CMS being proposed by the team:
* The shortfalls of the CMS being proposed:
* Perhaps a demo site (we would have to dress it up a little better for the SC)
* List of people who would like to commit themselves to helping with the running of the CMS:

This looks like a great outline for the final proposal. Thanks again for creating this. It may make 
sense to write out this proposal on the current wiki page 
(http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/Evaluation_of_CMS_Platforms) or perhaps a new page of 
its own?

-Ben

Benjamin Horst
bhorst@mac.com
646-464-2314 (Eastern)
www.solidoffice.com



This makes sense. I have just proposed this with Andre as well as the fact that there is probably a person on this discussion thread who would be willing to update the Wiki for public viewing.

Marc


--
E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.