On Oct 20, 2010, at 4:10 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Does anyone else have any specs to add to the list. Today (Wednesday) is most likely the last day
that specs should be added and it will leave us presumably two more days (Wednesday, Thursday) for
debate, testing and viewing of results of changes on the demo sites.
I am not sure, but do we also have to have a hands up of people who are willing to contribute their
time to help administer the site regardless of the choice of CMS? IMHO think that this kind of
commit would be nice to submit to the SC.
I will help in either case. (Though I'll be more effective with Drupal since I already know the
system.)
Remember André's original post that the SC discussed the choice of CMS at their last meeting and
the SC now wants to hear a proposal by the end of the week as to which CMS the team recommends. So,
our recommendation will go to the SC as a proposal which they will consider.
I would then suggest that our proposal should then account for the following:
* CMS proposed by the team:
* Virtues of the CMS being proposed by the team:
* The shortfalls of the CMS being proposed:
* Perhaps a demo site (we would have to dress it up a little better for the SC)
* List of people who would like to commit themselves to helping with the running of the CMS:
This looks like a great outline for the final proposal. Thanks again for creating this. It may make
sense to write out this proposal on the current wiki page
(http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/Evaluation_of_CMS_Platforms) or perhaps a new page of
its own?
-Ben
Benjamin Horst
bhorst@mac.com
646-464-2314 (Eastern)
www.solidoffice.com
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.