[libreoffice-users] Which is the more up-to-date: LODev 5.3.3.0.0, or LO 1:5.3.5.2-2?

Doug Hutcheson <owlbrudder -AT- gmail.com>
Sun, 20 Aug 2017 12:16:34 +1000

I hve been using LODev 5.3.3.0.0 for some time and it has been great.
Out of interest, I installed my distro (Fedora 26) version LO
1:5.3.5.2-2 and found it does not recognise the Basic libraries I
created in Dev, although the Writer module has different (newer?)
options in the tool bar. The question is, which version should I be
sticking with? If 1:5.3.5.2, what is the best way of migrating my macro
libraries and dialogs?
Kind regards,
Doug
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

[libreoffice-users] Which is the more up-to-date: LODev 5.3.3.0.0, or LO 1:5.3.5.2-2? · Doug Hutcheson
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Which is the more up-to-date: LODev 5.3.3.0.0, or LO 1:5.3.5.2-2? · zahra a
  - Re: [libreoffice-users] Which is the more up-to-date: LODev 5.3.3.0.0, or LO 1:5.3.5.2-2? · Doug Hutcheson
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Which is the more up-to-date: LODev 5.3.3.0.0, or LO 1:5.3.5.2-2? · jonathon

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.