Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: How to handle regressions

 I have no clue how my comment was rude, it's pretty standard in open
source world to say that "patches welcome" or some variation.

I'm unsubscribing though as I don't have the time nor energy to continue
this and you seem to have more than enough of both to go around. Enjoy
ranting on the thread.


Best,
Joel

On 10/03/2014 10:14 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 10/3/2014 12:25 PM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org> wrote:
> > On 10/2/2014 3:11 PM, V Stuart Foote <VStuart.Foote@utsa.edu> wrote:
> > > Charles S. (aka Tanstaafl) was given instructions
> > > and has agreed to do what needs to be done and review the corrected function
> > > for his use case with a current build of  master (4.4.0alpha0+)--and respond
> > > in the  fdo#76565
> > > <https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76565>   BZ issue
> > > regards the UX regression.
> > Fix confirmed (had some spare time this morning)...
> >
> > It was also mentioned in the bug that it would be back-ported to 4.3
> Also, I'm confused...
>
> Jan-Marek in the bug comment on August 17th - well before the 'Hard code
> freeze' on September 1st for 4.3.2 (released on Sept 22nd - said that
> the patch would show up in the daily builds after that.
>
> So, I'm not complaining, I'm just asking - can someone who understands
> the dev process explain why this fix did not make it into 4.3.2?
>
> Thanks


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted