Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index

 I have no clue how my comment was rude, it's pretty standard in open
source world to say that "patches welcome" or some variation.

I'm unsubscribing though as I don't have the time nor energy to continue
this and you seem to have more than enough of both to go around. Enjoy
ranting on the thread.


On 10/03/2014 10:14 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/3/2014 12:25 PM, Tanstaafl <> wrote:
On 10/2/2014 3:11 PM, V Stuart Foote <> wrote:
Charles S. (aka Tanstaafl) was given instructions
and has agreed to do what needs to be done and review the corrected function
for his use case with a current build of  master (4.4.0alpha0+)--and respond
in the  fdo#76565
<>   BZ issue
regards the UX regression.
Fix confirmed (had some spare time this morning)...

It was also mentioned in the bug that it would be back-ported to 4.3
Also, I'm confused...

Jan-Marek in the bug comment on August 17th - well before the 'Hard code
freeze' on September 1st for 4.3.2 (released on Sept 22nd - said that
the patch would show up in the daily builds after that.

So, I'm not complaining, I'm just asking - can someone who understands
the dev process explain why this fix did not make it into 4.3.2?


To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.