I sure did not like the "bloated" idea that looks to be read or implied
to LibreOffice. "Bloated", to me means it takes up a proportionally
large amount of drive space. 1 to 2 GBs worth at least. Also "bloated"
means that it is "bloated" with too many options that are not used by
most of its market.
I do not think LO will ever be "bloated" in either definition. Yes, our
developers will increase the "internal" options and others will develop
options that are added on through the Extension Manager. I think the
idea of an extension-based add on of options is a great idea. That way
the users can pick and choose which ones are wanted and not be told you
are required to have all these options that you will never use.
I do not think LO will ever be a "one package of every user" type of
office suite that MSO tries to be. Yes, LO can do a lot of things that
MSO can do, but do we really want to do everything they can do? NO,
since that would be a waste of our developers' effort. Plus it would
make improving LO a much more difficult task. MSO takes 1 to 3 years to
come out with their next version. Mostly that is due to having to fix
all the issues that a "bloated" package has every time you try to
"improve" it. MSO 2010 and its "ribbon" menu system hampered my efforts
to make a document quickly on a system that needed some documents made
up and displayed. I did not have access to my laptop at that time.
So, I agree the writer might not have known much about LO except it is a
competitor to MSO. At least having "competitor" status is a good thing,
but the idea that LO is as "Bloated" as MSO is not.
On 03/12/2014 01:18 PM, Jay Lozier wrote:
I am not sure the writer knows what they are talking about. One can
describe office suites, whether local or cloud, as light, medium, and
heavy. The light ones (Abiword) try to cover the major functionality
required by users for modest documents but deliberately omit features
many features. Light applications are often best suited for home and
very small office users. Medium have more features but try to avoid
having the very rare features that only a very few users will ever
need or use. I think LO and AOO strive to be here, relatively feature
rich without the many of the very rarely used features. Medium
applications try to hit the sweet of excellent performance with a
fairly rich feature set. Medium applications can be used by a large
majority of users. Heavy applications have all the features included
even if this sometimes hurts overall usability and performance. MS
Office is best known heavy office suite.
Also, some zdnet.com writers tend to shill for MS and will not admit
that users are in the best position to judge their needs and often a
non-MS solution is the overall best solution.
On 03/12/2014 09:34 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Is Office 365 worth spending 3x more than on Google Apps?
Summary: Office 365 is three times the cost of Google Apps. It's
worth it -- but probably not for the reason you expect...
By Matt Baxter-Reynolds
Office's competition has always been products that have tried to
emulate Office's enormous bulk -- think LibreOffice in particular.
Google Docs doesn't try to do that at all. It's a very minimal product.
We know that Office is enormous. There is nothing that the entire
product suite can't do. People often complain about it's labyrinthine
complexity. Another way to look at that is that Microsoft has
actually done a skilled job in masking that complexity. There's
enough in there to drive even the most ardent power user crazy.
Here is my question - are we trying to emulate MSO's "enormous bulk"
[of options]? I hope it is not though of as the bulk of hard drive
space needed to install MSO vs. LO.
I know that LO will not spend money on the server costs for a "cloud"
based version of LO hosted by LO, but it was an interesting read that
may be reflected into the development of LO for Android devices.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy