I am not sure the writer knows what they are talking about. One can
describe office suites, whether local or cloud, as light, medium, and
heavy. The light ones (Abiword) try to cover the major functionality
required by users for modest documents but deliberately omit features
many features. Light applications are often best suited for home and
very small office users. Medium have more features but try to avoid
having the very rare features that only a very few users will ever need
or use. I think LO and AOO strive to be here, relatively feature rich
without the many of the very rarely used features. Medium applications
try to hit the sweet of excellent performance with a fairly rich feature
set. Medium applications can be used by a large majority of users. Heavy
applications have all the features included even if this sometimes hurts
overall usability and performance. MS Office is best known heavy office
suite.
Also, some zdnet.com writers tend to shill for MS and will not admit
that users are in the best position to judge their needs and often a
non-MS solution is the overall best solution.
Jay
On 03/12/2014 09:34 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
http://www.zdnet.com/is-office-365-worth-spending-3x-more-than-on-google-apps-7000027225/
Is Office 365 worth spending 3x more than on Google Apps?
Summary: Office 365 is three times the cost of Google Apps. It's worth
it -- but probably not for the reason you expect...
By Matt Baxter-Reynolds
:quote:
Continuum
Office's competition has always been products that have tried to
emulate Office's enormous bulk -- think LibreOffice in particular.
Google Docs doesn't try to do that at all. It's a very minimal product.
We know that Office is enormous. There is nothing that the entire
product suite can't do. People often complain about it's labyrinthine
complexity. Another way to look at that is that Microsoft has actually
done a skilled job in masking that complexity. There's enough in there
to drive even the most ardent power user crazy.
:unquote:
Here is my question - are we trying to emulate MSO's "enormous bulk"
[of options]? I hope it is not though of as the bulk of hard drive
space needed to install MSO vs. LO.
I know that LO will not spend money on the server costs for a "cloud"
based version of LO hosted by LO, but it was an interesting read that
may be reflected into the development of LO for Android devices.
--
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.