Would it be possible to send the document to someone you trust who uses
the same version and see if it gets the same results?
On 11/26/2013 3:30 AM, Thomas wrote:
Very ture, indeed!
(2013/11/26 16:40), A wrote:
It's been my experience that bugs tickled only by one person are very
difficult to replicate without a highly detailed explanation of every
keystroke and mouse movement and sometimes even the exact data being
used. The best way to figure out what's going on is for someone with
the necessary skills to examine the computer with the problem.
As an example I was using an application (sflphone) that kept
crashing on ubuntu. The developer was unable to replicate the
problem. I granted him an account and he was kind enough to login
and poke around. In a short time he had determined that there was a
problem with the system libraries and his program was tickling a bug
in DBUS. I couldn't tell you why he was unable to replicate it on
his own machine, but he changed his code so that it wouldn't tickle
the bug and reported the bug to the DBUS team who also provided a
fix. I would never have been able to find this on my own, and it's
unlikely he would have been able to find it on his own without my
"help".
Sometimes it takes the cooperation of several parties to further the
cause.
If you want to return to the last edited position when you open the
document
just follow this topic
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/1144/how-to-save-cursor-position-in-writer/
Thank you very much Mr./Mrs. (?) A
I totally agree with you. However, I do not have the computer skills
to perform brain surgery on my machine and I would not know who to ask
to do so.
When LibreOffice was established after OpenOffice were taken over and
now seems to be semi-commercial, I sold my soul willingly to the LO
devil.
I prefer(ed) to stay with the rebels fighting for freedom ("Libre").
Yet I have run several times into situations where I was/am under the
impression the devil is not keeping its part of the deal.
For example, in this particular case, why does the "web layout" works
just fine with OpenOffice but not with Libreoffice.
Switching between these two applications does not change any settings
in my computer - I think. Or does it?
I could try upgrade to version 4 something, but after I tried that
before, I found that the "improvements" made things a lot worse for me
and
deliberately went back to 3.6.6.
The simple "solution" then seems to be: DO NOT USE the web layout
function.
It would make viewing and scrolling through long texts easier and
therefore its "disability" is somewhat annoying.
Mr. Pedro
Thank you for your hint. Yes, I am aware of the "cursor position" and
personal information in Libreoffice.
This works, sort of most of the time.
The "problem" is, the cursor ALWAYS jumps back to the top of the
document when changing to "web layout".
This may not be a problem when you are working with a 2-3-page
document, but when working with a 220-page book text?
Since the cursor jumps to the top of the document, I MUST move
elsewhere in the document -> LO crashes.
Not funny.
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.