On 11/10/2013 1:46 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello,
As there were some exchanges about the survey here and as I advertised
it on this mailing list as well, I thought you might be interested by
my initial analysis:
http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2013/11/10/users-the-final-frontier/
Thank you for your participation!
I'm glad you think it was such a great success. I personally feel you
would have a much larger response had the questionnaire been better
formulated. So many of the questions' multiple choice answers had no
choice which reflected my situation/experience. After a while I decided
not to continue with it and discarded it because it was obvious that it
would not have reflected my situation/experience (which I presume was
the goal). I suppose it is possible that for some questions there are
only a few possible answers, but for most, the choice of "other" should
be made available, or possibly even a blank line to fill in.
--
Dale Erwin
Jr. 28 de Julio 657, Depto. 03
Magdalena del Mar, Lima 17 PERU
http://leather.casaerwin.org
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.