Hi :)
As James said it might well be better to make a separate partition for your /home. It's easier to
do that during the install process but this link can be handy if you want to try this post-install.
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Partitioning/Home/Moving
If the way you are doing it keeps working then you might as well stick to that but thee are other
advantages to having a separate /home
The way Don is doing it doesn't work for a very few programs (such as Evolution (an alternative to
Thunderbird&Lightning)) but does work for almost all afaik. I used to do the same thing but since
2010 the upgrade process has been really, really smooth so i have often gone for that instead now.
I do occasionally do a fresh install onto the same machine but that is for other reasons (such as
testing or just to get more practice or because my fiddling around has broken something i don't
know how to fix and then want it back the way it was before i started fiddling).
I've even found that i can do a fresh install over the top of an existing one and that keeps all my
settings&configs as long as i didn't format the partition during the install. I have installed a
10.04 over the top of a 10.10 and then when i opened Firefox all the same tabs opened that i had
left open in the 10.10. Errr, my main reasoning there was to try to upgrade an unsupported version
without having to use subsequent versions that were also unsupported. By going backwards to the
10.04 LTS (LTS= Long Term Support) i was then able to upgrade LTS to LTS to get to the 12.04LTS.
Again Firefox remembered all my tabs. Afterwards i realised i could have just done a fresh install
of the 12.04 instead of using the 10.04LS as a stepping stone. Hindsight is great isn't it! ;)
Regards from
Tom :)
----- Original Message -----
From: James Knott <james.knott@rogers.com>
To: LibreOffice <users@global.libreoffice.org>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, 6 October 2013, 18:39
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer
Errors??)
Don Myers wrote:
I started with Ubuntu with version 8.10, and have had each version
since then. I generally find it easiest to do a clean install. One
advantage of that is every 6 months I have a complete backup of my
hard drive. The second advantage is it is very easy to do. Each
program has its own hidden file under the home directory, such as
.thunderbird, .mozilla, .filezilla, gimp-2.8, etc. Once the new
install is completed, and you have the programs installed that you
wish from the repository or the ppa, open each one one time to create
the .whatever hidden file. Then simply delete that file and replace it
with the backed up file, and you have all of your settings, e-mail,
bookmarks, server settings for filezille, and everything exactly the
way was. Very easy and very fast. Much, much, much faster than doing a
clean install of Windows.
Why not just have a separate /home partition? That way, you don't have
to delete & replace the app files.
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) (continued)
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Virgil Arrington
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Kracked_P_P---webmaster
- boot-loaders, was: Fw: [libreoffice-users] Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Tom Davies
- [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Urmas
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Kracked_P_P---webmaster
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · James Knott
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Kracked_P_P---webmaster
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Don Myers
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · James Knott
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Tom Davies
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Kracked_P_P---webmaster
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · James Knott
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Tom Davies
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Robert Holtzman
- Repositories, was: Fw: [libreoffice-users] Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Tom Davies
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Urmas
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Mirosław Zalewski
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · James Knott
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Urmas
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Mirosław Zalewski
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.