Dnia 2013-10-07, o godz. 22:50:29
"Urmas" <davian818@gmail.com> napisał(a):
There is only
one appstore for all clients and it always have the recent version of
the software.
And there is only one official repository for each Linux
distributions*. If you treat all Linux distributions as one "operating
system", then you are mistaken.
There is nothing in repository concept that would prevent inclusion of
the most recent version of software, even on the day of release. If
repository do not contain newest version of software, it's always due
to politics or lack of manpower.
And if you are unhappy with internal politics of your distribution,
perhaps you should try another one?
Also it should be noted that in Android and iOS world, repository is
often the only viable way to distribute your software among your users.
Therefore, software vendors approach repository administration to
include their software and the day software package hit repository is
considered official "release date".
In Linux world, software vendors release their software by other means,
such as personal webpages, source repositories and third-party sites.
They often don't care about inclusion of software in repositories and
most certainly do not coordinate releases with administrators of
repositories.
* Repositories are often split into branches, so it might appear
that there are few of them; but as long as you can switch between
branches with relative ease, I think we can talk about single
repository.
Yes, repositories in Windows/Mac/Android/iOS differ considerably to
repositories in Linux. But these differences are always political,
institutional, social or psychological, never technical.
--
Best regards
Mirosław Zalewski
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) (continued)
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: boot-loaders, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Robert Holtzman
- Repositories, was: Fw: [libreoffice-users] Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Tom Davies
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Urmas
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Mirosław Zalewski
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · James Knott
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Urmas
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Mirosław Zalewski
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · James Knott
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Urmas
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Paul
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Robert Holtzman
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Urmas
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · M Henri Day
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Jay Lozier
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Urmas
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · Paul
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Repositories, was: Fw: Penguins: (Was Corrupt Installer Errors??) · M Henri Day
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.