Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi :)
I kinda agree but even though IE has recently become a minority share of the web-browser market it 
is still used by quite a lot of people.  Usually those people are clueless about the alternatives 
and/or seem to think they are using a superior product because they haven't really tried anything 
else.  There's a LOT of them and we don't want to cut them out of our potential market.  Telling 
them they have to change web-browser just to use LO just gives them an extra reason not to bother 
trying LO.  It just makes yet another artificial barrier and increases the FUD.  

Something that does seem to surprise people and encourage them to install LO is that they can have 
both LO and MSO on their system.  A dismaying number of people wont dare try LO because they think 
they have to get rid of their MSO.  Similarly with web-browsers of course but that is not our 
fight.  

I'm credited with having written the 2nd paragraph below but it really wasn't me
1.  Most of the web developers i know are ladies
2.  If i had thought of it i would have written directly to the Websites List to ask them if they 
could do it.  
probably the only reason it might not have been done already is that they are a small team and are 
still working on it.  However, i doubt that IE 9 needs a different certificate from IE 8 or that 
certificates made for IE 8 are incompatible with IE 9.  It's always possible, of course, especially 
if it could make things difficult for LO without affecting too many other people.  

Most of the people on tis list probably are already using Firefox, Chrome, the Mac one, Opera or 
some other non-MS web-browser.  We need to catch more people that haven't tried the others yet and 
maybe be their gateway into OpenSource.  

Regards from
Tom :)  







________________________________
From: P NIKOLIC <p.nikolic1@btinternet.com>
To: users@global.libreoffice.org 
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2013, 7:29
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Errores de certificado en la web


On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:05:57 +0700
"Urmas" <davian818@gmail.com> wrote:

"Tom Davies":

Note that IE is made by a 3rd party competitor that has good reason
to want to see LibreOffice (and all other OpenSource products) fail.
The more they can do to discredit LibreOffice the more likely they
are to sell more of their own product and make more money.  So, if IE
doesn't behave we might not be able to  do anything about it.

...Or LO webmasters could just stop being idiots and not offer a
certificate for *.documentfoundation.org for libreoffice.org? 




Or you could just install FireFox and be done with the problems ..

Pete .


-- 
Linux 7-of-9 3.9.9-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jul 3 22:45:16 CEST 2013
x86_64 GNU/Linux

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted




-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.