Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 6/13/13 5:12 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Hmm, there are many reasons for preferring non-MS.  Backwards compatibility is just 1 of the 
issues.  Current compatibility with it's own current formats is another.  A third is whether it's 
current formats work with non-MS products that do follow the OOXML ISO standard.
Regards from
Tom :)

Preferring MS or not, or any other format, isn't the point here.

It's accessing the old files regardless of format, which even LO appears to be abandoning. You can't have it both ways, use ODT because the standards will remain unchanged so old files can be accessed while accepting a decision that prevents the accurate opening of the old files.


Mac OS X 10.8.4
Firefox 20.0
Thunderbird 17.0.5

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.