Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index



Without trying to defend MS, it can only dominate markets that customers allow it to dominate. Nobody is forced to purchase MS products. They do so because, for whatever reason, they perceive that MS serves their needs. One of those needs is file compatibility with others, which by its nature, allows MS sales to feed on themselves. The more people buy MS products, the more people need to buy MS products to communicate with all the others who went before.

But, of course, the only reason file compatibility is an issue - the only reason MS can behave as it does - is that it is an effective monopoly. Last time I checked monopolies are anti-competitive, and there are LAWS in the US to curb them. So I agree, there is a role for gov't to step in. Good luck waiting for that though. Break the monopoly for a few years by being hyper-vigilant about code development and marketing and you might actually break the monopoly for good.

Furthermore, if enough people forced gov't to accept standardized document types (e.g. ODT or even PDFs!), the monopoly would weaken.

Carl

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.