I have not seen any "performance hits" with my use of either the 98K or
the 217K word list dictionaries. The actual time would difference would
be really small. I have not tried using a 390K or 638K word lists
though. For a real large document that I used for testing sometimes,
you should not see any difference for spell checker lookup.
I do not know what type of searches are used in LO to search the word
lists for the word lookup, but for the old 80286 systems that I use to
do this type of programming with these 50K vs 638K list searches would
take about a 1/10 of a second difference for the same 100,000 word
document. This was what I generally got for my word list searches back
in the 80's with the programming samples I wrote. The professor wanted
a timer included in the search software so he could see how efficient
your code was. College is where I got interested in dictionary and word
list searches and functions for spell checking. To re-learn C++ after
my second stroke, I write a program to create word lists from e-book
text and compare them with the current lists to see what new words I
could find.
The fact the the original .dic files had control codes after each word
requires the system to do the work to do the conversions and then use
those options in its searching. So having lists that do not need those
control codes may make spelling searched faster.
On 11/08/2011 03:13 AM, Mark Stanton wrote:
I'm always interested in "the most comprehensive".
Presumably there's a performance hit related to the size of
dictionary?
Mark Stanton
One small step for mankind...
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.