Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index



I have not seen any "performance hits" with my use of either the 98K or the 217K word list dictionaries. The actual time would difference would be really small. I have not tried using a 390K or 638K word lists though. For a real large document that I used for testing sometimes, you should not see any difference for spell checker lookup.

I do not know what type of searches are used in LO to search the word lists for the word lookup, but for the old 80286 systems that I use to do this type of programming with these 50K vs 638K list searches would take about a 1/10 of a second difference for the same 100,000 word document. This was what I generally got for my word list searches back in the 80's with the programming samples I wrote. The professor wanted a timer included in the search software so he could see how efficient your code was. College is where I got interested in dictionary and word list searches and functions for spell checking. To re-learn C++ after my second stroke, I write a program to create word lists from e-book text and compare them with the current lists to see what new words I could find.

The fact the the original .dic files had control codes after each word requires the system to do the work to do the conversions and then use those options in its searching. So having lists that do not need those control codes may make spelling searched faster.




On 11/08/2011 03:13 AM, Mark Stanton wrote:
I'm always interested in "the most comprehensive".
Presumably there's a performance hit related to the size of
dictionary?

Mark Stanton
One small step for mankind...





--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.