Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Dead End or Evolution?

On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 17:29 -0700, gomadtroll wrote: 

> I use GNU Linux Debian and LO is the same code & many developers as the
> previous OO that was released with this distro.
>
> That said , the LO devs are doing a lot of work on the code, cleanups, their
> words, and I have noticed some 'enhancements' in LO 3.4.3. 
>
> LO ver 3.3.4 looks & acts the same as my previous ver, OO 3.2.1, for my use.
> The enhancement to how Tables line styles is configured has changed, and it
> is not rendering double lines the same as ver 3.3.4 and previous OO
> versions.. If your documents, the archived ones, have tables, they won't be
> readable with LO ver 3.4.3. There are bug(s) filed against this issue,
> something like #38542. 
>
> I would say LO ver 3.3.4 is a replacement for all previous versions of OO 
> and in time LO version 3.4.x will be even better. No need to run multiple
> versions.

I think the idea is to have on version a little more bleeding edge and
one version that is stable. The stable version is for those who can not
tolerate a slightly quirky version of LO, particularly in business. 

> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Dead-End-or-Evolution-tp3352009p3357342.html
> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted