On Thursday 17 February 2011 17:28:32 webmaster for Kracked Press Productions
wrote:
My point, when I started this thread, was that is looks like
from the list that there are less people are dealing with OOo's
list and more dealing with LibreOffice's list.
The libreoffice.user data cannot actually be comparative without knowing
how may posters are OOo-to-LO converts. You'd probably have to trim it
even more as some (many) posters are using both OOo and LO& still
comparing.
An exercise for those with too much time on their hands:
http://gmane.org/output-rate.php?group=gmane.comp.openoffice.questions
Copy that into a LO Writer doc, then paste into Calc. You can then play
with the numbers as you wish.
I use OOo with openSUSE 11.2, LO on openSUSE 11.3 (to try it out) and LO on
openSUSE 11.4 RC1 where it comes by default. When I ditch openSUSE 11.2, I do
not intend to continue with OOo since I have not hit serious problems with LO.
Well done the LO team!
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.