Hi :)
Yes, but that is part of the point about opinions. Often they don't make sense
to people that don't already agree but so what? Do we have to criticise people
or their ideas? Many people have already posted pointing out errors and any
more is unnecesary, unhelpful and more likely to entrench people in their own
opinions regardless of facts.
Regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: Gordon Burgess-Parker <gbplinux@gmail.com>
To: users@libreoffice.org
Sent: Fri, 4 February, 2011 12:12:57
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice
On 04/02/2011 12:01, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Please can we stop posting criticisms of Ken's opinions?
But his reasoning as to why he doesn't advocate FOSS is flawed. His given
reasons are spurious and don't hold up in real life. That's the point...
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Gordon Burgess-Parker
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Ken Springer
Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice and OpenOffice · Ken Springer
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.