Marc Paré wrote (29-04-13 05:21)
Where I believe the whole project is disjointed is that without an LTS,
the TDF/LibreOffice project cuts itself out of the large
institutional/organizational market. I doubt very much that a large
institution wishing to save money on licensing fees would be very
willing to spend the savings on devs trying to keep a version of
LibreOffice up and working from one budget period to the next reasonable
budget term.
If you see it like that, I agree. But if a larger organisation deploys
e.g. a 3.6.6, then looks at the 4.0.4/5/6, or skip that and start again
looking at 4.1.4, there is a quite large time frame, which gives the
situation a bit more nuances.
I bet it's not uncommon that organisations stick with versions for
years, because they want to avoid the burden of updating. Which is
something they learned trough time.
(A burden that IMHO is pretty low considered that you understand the
process and spent time at the right moments.)
Regards,
Cor
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.