Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Sorry, I am not used to be "hard" in mailing lists, but I would like to stop this thread as it is quite useless, for the reasons I have already tried to express in a more polite way in other messages and I will reiterate - for the last time - in this answer.

On 1/2/11 3:43 PM, Tom Davies wrote:

The assumption in this list appears to be that "free" is the only "unique
selling point" (=USP) that LibreOffice has and that it will generate large-scale

No, the assumption is that we are going to use extremely sophisticated marketing strategies that are going to be shared in private - as I do not want to give any advantage to Microsoft, especially in US - and will grow the awareness of LibreOffice.

Of course, there will be many USPs, one of them being the concept of "free software".

However, i think 10years of OpenOffice using that USP has resulted in
MicroSquish dominating the market.  This proves that the USP of being free has
NOT been favourable.

I have already requested in another message to avoid using useless "funny" way to call Microsoft. I reiterate the request. Please stop using any term different from Microsoft and MS Office.

The usage of these terms qualifies any individual as an unwelcome member of this community.

If 10 years worth of real-life data is not enough then i doubt a market survey
will make much difference.

Data in Europe tell that OOo has gone from nowhere to 20% market share, thanks to the communities that have promoted the software and made it a success.

In US, Sun has just been a marketing disaster, as in Europe (but in Europe communities have done Sun's job, a lot better than Sun).

Analysts confirm that OOo has grown from nowhere to 20% market share in Europe, and to 15% worldwide. US are the weakest market for OOo.

In that same time-frame Firefox grew by a very much larger percentage to the
point where it has now overtaken Internet Explorer within the same time-frame.
Firefox did have the advantage that people though IE was free and therefore were
relatively happy to accept that IE might not be high quality.

You are totally wrong, and it looks like you understanding of marketing - at least free software marketing - is limited. The reasons behind the success of Firefox have nothing to do with "free", and the demise of IE has nothing to do with "free" (being the two free a different story).

Firefox is a good product, IE is a nightmare, to the point that even MS has not been able to sustain it in a successful way.

Ubuntu has also grown in a similar  time-frame to the point that in almost any
newsagents you will see at least 1 magazine mentioning it or even carrying a
full article about it.  Where are the articles about OpenOffice?

In Italy, there is an average of 300+ articles each month about OOo. In other European geographies the number is lower but significant. In the US, thanks to Sun, the average is 0.

Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation
Mobile +39.348.5653829 - VoIP: +39.02.320621813
Skype: italovignoli - GTalk:

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.