12.12.2014 u 12:45, Stanislav Horáček je napisao/la:
This workflow means that everyone is forced to work on master -
otherwise it is needed to translate the same strings again and again
in branches which makes no sense.
And that's why I am confused - because we were assured that it will be
possible to choose between working on master and working on branches.
In my head is like this:
- Master is updated every day in pootle, but only source strings. If you
translate something, it will stick, but only if dev doesn't change
source string again (which is possible since it's work in progress).
- When 6 months passes, everything is moved to "stable" branch,
This is where is gets tricky. How do you transfer translations between
master and stable?
What if I updated some translations only in stable? Do they get
backported to master?
Anyway, as long as they don't delete my translations in stable, I don't
have anything against master branch, but I will probably not use it.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Workflow based on master · Christian Lohmaier
- Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Workflow based on master (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy