Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Workflow based on master

Could someone please explain what's currently proposed in terms that 
avoid terms like 'master' There are a lot of localizers who work on the 
basis of 'I see a string, I translate it' who aren't necessarily 
familiar with masters and branches and whatnots but since this will 
affect localizers, this should be explained in simple terms. A lot of 
the people I support off-list wouldn't be able to make that choice 
knowing what they're getting themselves in for.

Or let me rephrase that as a question. Does the current proposal
- minimize retranslation work by not presenting localizer with hundreds 
of retranslations when the English source goes from a formatted 
something to an unformatted something or back again?
- present the localizers with stable strings i.e. strings which are 
likely in their final form for use in the UI?

Michael

Sgrìobh Stanislav Horáček na leanas 12/12/2014 aig 11:45:
> Keeping master updated always means more work and it is the reason why 
> I think that each team should decide if they want to use master or not.
>
> Best regards,
> Stanislav 


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted