Hi *,
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Christian Lohmaier
<lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Rimas Kudelis <rq@akl.lt> wrote:
2011.04.07 20:38, Christian Lohmaier rašė:
[seperate worker for export/zip]
There don't seem to be any drawbacks, so that's the way to go - this
way regular translation will not be blocked/affected by the exporting
blocking all available worker slots or all RAM or all CPU
Unfortunately, real-usage also lets the regular workers grow insanely
(from standard of around 80/90MB to700MB) - thus I had to reduce the
lifetime of the regular worker again as well.
ciao
Christian
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pootle migration · Sérgio Marques
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pootle migration · Leif Lodahl
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pootle migration · Rimas Kudelis
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.