Hi,
2011.04.07 20:38, Christian Lohmaier rašė:
Thus especially to Friedel and Dwayne and Rimas: Is there a problem with adding
WSGIDaemonProcess pootle-export threads=3 stack-size=1048576
maximum-requests=5 inactivity-timeout=1200 display-name=%{GROUP}
<Location /*/*/export/zip>
WSGIProcessGroup pootle-export
</Location>
to the vhost's config? In turn the process lifetime of the regular
threads can then be increased again. How many of the export workers
can be allowed then is more a question of stress concurrent ones add
to the i/o (be it mysql related or raw disk i/o) and less of memory
wastage.
I like the idea, but I'll leave it to Friedel and Dwayne to judge if
it's problematic or not.
Rimas
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pootle migration · Sérgio Marques
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.