Re: [libreoffice-l10n] LO33RC3 Known L10N Issues

2011.01.18 10:10, Martin Srebotnjak rašė:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/1/18 Rimas Kudelis<rq@akl.lt>
>
> > 2011.01.18 00:47, Olav Dahlum rašė:
> >
> > Could we be better off with the same document preserved as e.g PDF?
> > I don't think the file format matters, and since LO can't open PDF's (or
> > can it?), I think it's totally OK to have an OpenDocument file. What I don't
> > like is the way it looks at the moment.
> The thing about ODT files opening in an office suite - they are editable
> documents. Why does a text editor open a text file? It obviously wants and
> calls upon a user to edit it. In this case a document opens that explicitly
> says - do not mess with me, I should not be changed. So it is at least funny
> if nothing else.

It's opened as read-only, so that's fine with me. You can only edit its 
copy, and you can do that either way.

> Maybe the most appropriate format would be html and the page should open in
> a browser. Every OS has one. PDF readers are not present on all
> out-of-the-box systems.

Perhaps even better would be opening all that text in a simple textbox 
in LO's UI. But I don't mind a nice OpenDocument either, it just has to 
look nice. :)

Rimas


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***