Le 2010-12-26 15:47, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Thank you for your input. I think that we have never been able to come
up with one unified workflow in the past, and I would advise against
getting too formal here. We would probably discourage a lot of people.
So let's keep things simple, shall we? :-)
Anyone can draft a documentation , in its own language, and may the
best one win!
Best,
Charles.
We should not look at this as a competition. These are options. All
stakeholders should take a close look at different options and try to
pick what is best to work with even if it means adapting one or the
other and including what is best out of both. A third option built out
of these two may make more sense.
Making this into a competition is counter-productive to the membership
and creates camps for no reason at all. Consensus is the reasonable way
to operate as well as membership building.
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.