Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Michael,

thanks for your proposal. I had a quick look at it.

2010/12/26 Michael Wheatland <michael@wheatland.com.au>:
Hi David et al,
As I had promised, it is Boxing day, and my idea has been developed
into something more than just a scribble on a scrap of paper.

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibreOffice_documentation_workflow_proposal.odp

The idea is to promote structured coordination between documentation
language teams to allow concepts and content to flow from one language
to another without restricting how the concept is implemented in any
NL document.
I have built the idea from the documentation workflow that Jean
proposed we use from the OOoAuthors site, including an editing and
review process for every proposed change regardless of language.

I am not sure what direction language teams have taken regarding
documentation and if this proposal fits in with any existing plans,
could someone comment on this?

I would appreciate feedback to the open questions at the end of the
document, if you have a constructive opinion, I am more than happy to
adapt the approach if something is more appropriate / better outcome.

To answer some of your open questions:

We should also have a look at pootle, since Sophie is running a test
to use it for translation purposes (see her announcement here:
<http://go.mail-archive.com/Hn9qvZS2yGYyXSWq7P0JtElbvo0=> ). Pootle is
a tool, that is known to many translators, so it might be useful to
take it into account as well. We'll see what the result is of this
test.

Btw, I'm not sure, that Jean recommended using the Wiki for developing
the documentation. I would say it was more the opposite. :)

I would like to have a common template among all the languages, so I'm
in favour of this idea.

For having the same structure: I think, the headings are chosen to
have a logical layout and flow of the text. So in my opinion, it would
make sense to have a similar structure in the other languages as well.
But I would not force other language teams to have the same structure.
Maybe there is a good reason, why they want to change it.

So I'll stop here for now - if I have more to say, I'll send another mail. ;)

Sigrid

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.