Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting minutes: 2020-03-05

On 10/03/2020 13:19, rene.engelhard@mailbox.org wrote:
> Am 10. März 2020 10:25:50 MEZ schrieb Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>:
> > On 06/03/2020 16:31, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > And i think https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/88833 should then
> > be
> > > done, too, as it makes it more clear (what is a "subsequentcheck"?)
> > and
> > > would be a good rationale to rename
> > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice-subsequentcheckbase
> > > to something sane (that one is used for in the autopkgtests which run
> > > the junit tests against a installed (in /usr/lib/libreoffice) LO)
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand you.  subsequentcheck is orthongonal to
> > JUnitTest.  There are JUnitTests that are not in subsequentcheck, and
> > there are tests other than JUnitTests that are in subsequentcheck.
>
> The OOoRunner tests, yes. Otherwise: no.

No idea what you mean with "yes" and "no" there.

> make subsequentcheck does only run java tests: cf. 
> https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/blob/master/tests/junit. That 
> one results in 
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/libr/libreoffice/4506235/log.gz +search for 
> the junit test.)

At least for my local build, that's not the case:

> $ make subsequentcheck
[...]
> [PYT] dbaccess_python
> [JUT] forms_complex
> [JUT] comphelper_complex
> [CUT] io_textinputstream
[...]