Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2020 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 06/03/2020 16:31, Rene Engelhard wrote:
And i think https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/88833 should then be
done, too, as it makes it more clear (what is a "subsequentcheck"?) and
would be a good rationale to rename
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libreoffice-subsequentcheckbase
to something sane (that one is used for in the autopkgtests which run
the junit tests against a installed (in /usr/lib/libreoffice) LO)

I'm not sure I understand you. subsequentcheck is orthongonal to JUnitTest. There are JUnitTests that are not in subsequentcheck, and there are tests other than JUnitTests that are in subsequentcheck.

(For mostly historical reasons, the difference between unitcheck and subsequentcheck is that the latter depends on a fully populated instdir before running its tests. After the transition from the two-stage dmake-based build system to gbuild was completed, this could have been cleaned up, moving the relevant dependencies into the individual tests. But then again, the distinction between unitcheck and subsequentcheck continued to look somewhat useful, to have a default make target that runs some but not all of the tests. Now that that odd default make target is going away, it should indeed become possible to drop the distinction between unitcheck and subsequentcheck.)


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.